Spoliers: Why I don't trust Mofftiss anymore
On tumblr and message boards alike fans are turning themselves into pretzels in an effort to make sense of the senseless. Among other things they are trying to find out:
Why the man formerly
known as Sherlock Holmes was not able to recognise his best friend's fiancee as
what she was when he met her.
Why he has
become so stupid he can't figure anything out any more and has to shoot a man
in the head instead of outwitting him.
Why the man
formerly known as the moral compass to the man formerly known as Sherlock
Holmes forgives his assassin wife for shooting his best friend in the chest.
Why said best
friend says she has saved his life after she has shot him in the chest.
Why there is a
baby no one seems to know where to raise in the future.
Where the real
Sherlock Holmes and John Watson have gone (to AO3?).
Where all this
will lead now that S3 is over and the long wait begins again.
It's sad to
see. The long time fans still want to love the show, but it's getting more and
more difficult for them.
What disturbed
me the most were the de-mystification of Sherlock Holmes, the clumsy handling
of the reunion, the retroactive devaluation of the emotional arc of TRF and the
emotionally utterly unsatisfying "resolution" to the fall-out of TRF.
The best explanation for the
bomb-go-boom fake the internet has come up with as of yet is,
"Well, it's a Brit thing."
All right, I
confess I was able to wave most of the inconsistencies and logical errors away
up to now, but this time I cannot. Because a) this time the shiny wasn't enough
due to the lamentable absence of Paul McGuigan (why does he have to do other
work than Sherlock, fer God's sakes?) and b) the emotional arc of this season
was exhausting. Had TRF to be laughed away just so they could do it all over
again? How many times does Sherlock have to self-sacrifice? I hope this doesn't
become a trend.
I'm sorry, but
I'm at the end of my tether. Fandom has contorted itself into all possible shapes
to make sense of everything we're presented with and even managed to explain
away flukes, inconsistencies and uneven characterisation. To a degree.
Sherlock gave
Mary the side-eye when she mentioned skip codes. He must be onto her.
Sherlock
persuaded John to forgive Mary, because he's playing the long game.
It will all be
tied together in S4 when we will see that Mary is Moran and Sherlock knew from
the start.
No, I don't
believe anything any more. All the "clues" for this interpretation or
that possible endgame that some people claim to see are most likely just there
because someone thought they were cool.
Remember S2/3
and I.O.U. (a fall)? I must have read a dozen theories on the hidden meaning of
that thing.
According to
Mark Gatiss on twitter when asked why it was never explained, "What do you
mean, 'what does it mean'? Moriarty carved it into an apple and left. That's
all."
It was just
something cool to put there. There is no hidden meaning, no back story, no
psychological depth. In other words the writers have successfully fooled us
into thinking they are far more clever than they really are.
I imagine it
goes like this:
"Let's
have a submarine in that scene! Submarines are cool."
"But that
scene plays in the mountains! How would it get there?"
"Who
cares? As long as everything looks really cool? The fans will figure it out.
Ha, that will give them something to do till next season, hehe."
I'm finally
getting to the point where I can understand enraged Doctor Who fans who have
been left in the lurch far longer and more often than Sherlock fans. And it's
sad, when you are practically told by the creators that you are a moron,
because you wish to fully understand their creation.
It's neither
enough nor a good idea to just incorporate fan theories and/or fanfiction into
the show. Even if you think the fans will love the in-jokes (some do) and the
casual viewer won't mind them if they're funny enough. What the fans really
want is tight characterisation and plot. When we have that we do need neither
the submarine nor the winks in our direction.
It seems to be
all about the casual viewer who will not notice inconsistencies and just
thinks, "Oy, a submarine! Cool! Carry on, jolly good!" But it were
not the casual viewers who made the hashtag #IbelieveinSherlockHolmes go viral
and become a force to be reckoned with.
Only next
season's ratings will show the success of this last season, because the
sky-high ratings of this season do not mean that S3 was beloved by everyone as
Steven Moffat thinks. S3 ratings were down to the expectations raised by the
previous seasons one and two.
A week after
S3/3 aired it seems to get already noticeably more quiet everywhere the show is
discussed (and in far less enthusiastic tones) than two years ago. I doubt this
season will last us as long as S2.
Please,
Mofftiss, I beg you, do not make me watch Elementary!
Written by Silke Ketelsen
As having finished Series Three and just now getting to your posts, I find myself once again in the position of agreeing with you. I never thought "Sherlock" was great--good, yes, at times very good, but not great. But to have two episodes suck as badly as "The Empty Hearse" and "His Last Vow" is disappointing, to say the least.
ReplyDeleteThank you! Though I must admit I really wish we would still find ourselves on opposite sides. :-(
ReplyDeleteDon't worry. We'll always have "Elementary".
ReplyDelete;-D))
ReplyDelete