Guest post: Book Review of "Erasing Sherlock" by Kelly Hale
Please find below the latest guest post. This is a book review provided by the formidable Silke Ketelsen.
"Erasing Sherlock"
by Kelly Hale
"Seeking maid-of-all-work. Master
of Arts required. Opportunities for research in the field. Must be able to
relocate in time."
This is the advert to which doctoral
candidate Gillian Rose Petra answers. To her delight she actually wins the
chance to travel back in time to observe the young Sherlock Holmes at the
beginning of his career in his natural habitat, Bakerstreet 221B, London.
Working as Rose Donnelly, a housemaid for Mrs Hudson, she starts to document
his methods for her doctoral thesis.
Kelly Hale is an American author and
"Erasing Sherlock Holmes" was her first novel which was published as
an eBook in 2000 after it won a $10,000 award in the Great North American
Fiction Contest.
Her second novel, written with a
co-author, was the BBC Doctor Who novel "Grimm Reality". Since then
she seems to have written only short stories.
Her Faction Paradox novel
"Erasing Sherlock" is a re-working of the earlier "Erasing
Sherlock Holmes" and was first published in December 2006.
The Faction Paradox is a fictional
time travelling crime syndicate, headed by one Jimmy Moriarty, which originally
featured as recurring antagonists in the BBC Doctor Who Adventure novels.
The novel starts out very promising
when Gillian aka Rose, hiding behind her feather duster, is able to overhear a
few partly hilarious Holmes/Watson conversations.
The way Holmes is described I could
not avoid imagining our modern day Holmes, Benedict Cumberbatch, in the role –
although the novel might have been written with Jeremy Brett in mind as
"Sherlock" was not even a twinkle in the eyes of Moffat/Gatiss at the
time.
The "Sherlock" creators have
often stated that apart from the original ACD canon all movies, shows,
pastiches etc. have been fodder for their inspiration and, as Kelly Hale was
writing for Doctor Who as well, I feel pretty sure that they know her work.
Thus it is entirely possible that several parallels between the book and the
"Sherlock" series are there for a reason and don't exist entirely in
my imagination.
For instance there is a circus acrobat
cat burglar haunting London like in TBB, although she's not a member of a
Chinese triade and doesn't murder anyone. Then there's the way Jimmy Moriarty
intends to destroy, respectively "erase", Sherlock by utterly destroying
his reputation. Sound familiar?
Sadly it doesn't even take one third
of the novel before Gillian and Holmes fall in love and into bed. I would have
much preferred if she would have stayed true to her goal and really researched
him, as I could have read hundreds of pages of Gillian just telling us about
the daily life at 221B.
From then on the story gets rather
convoluted as several plots fight for attention: Gillian is arrested for
supposedly being the cat burglar. Holmes gets entangled in a scandalous divorce
involving a homosexual relationship. Gillian and Watson are kidnapped and held
captive. All the while a child molester/murderer is stalking his prey in the
dark and foggy London alleys. Kudos to the author for somehow unraveling this
truly Gordian knot and bringing it all to a logical conclusion!
As entertaining as this story was in
parts, the ending then gets rather Whovian in dimensions and strays too far
from its origins for my taste. But overall it is a light and quite exciting
read and will please those who love to hunt for easter eggs and hidden cross
connections and such. And those who are not adverse to a little romance even
better than me.
Overall three stars out of five.
Wow! Without any corrections/editions? And 'formidable'? *blusheswithdelight* Thank you so much!!! <3
ReplyDeleteGood review, Thanks.
DeleteSurely the whole point of the novel is that entering Sherlock into a sexual relationship destroys his character? It's definitely not a story for Holmes purists, but that's the idea to see how far Sherlock's character can be stretched before it breaks.
ReplyDeleteOh, Mr Holmes' character is very elastic and always reverts back to its original - otherwise he wouldn't have endured so long. Also, I don't think that a sexual relationship would necessarily do that, we can't be sure what he did before happening on Watson or in the intervals when they didn't see each other.
DeleteBut you're right, I don't think this story is for purists. Still, it has enjoyable parts even if I, like you, would have preferred if the researcher would rather have researched him instead of engaging him.